---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: DR AWATAR SINGH SEKHON <assekhon@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, May 29, 2011 at 9:26 PM
Subject: [bangla-vision] Re: Master Tara Singh "Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki) Responds"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Harjinder Singh Dilgeer" <hsdilgeer@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, May 29, 2011 4:13
Subject: Master Tara Singh
To: sikhcommunity@googlegroups.com
> Veer Gurmit Singh Ji,
> you have written that "
> We may recall that during 1947, Master Tara Singh and Baldev
> Singh had betrayed
> the Sikh Nation politically by surrendering to the Indian
> Congress Leaders"
> Dear it is totally unfair to blame Master Tara Singh (MTS) for
> 1947 crisis; please go through history and especially secret
> documents (now allowed to public). Blaming MTS for what he had
> not done is like being ungrateful for the man who sacrificed
> everything in his life.
>
> Please read the following (from my book 'SIKH HISTORY in 10
> volumes', volume 5:
>
>
> Role of Master Tara Singh
>
> Sirdar Kapur Singh, a disgruntled I.C.S. officer, in
> his book Saachi Saakhi has tried to put all the blame for not
> having achieved an independent Sikh State on Master Tara Singh
> and Baldev Singh but it is untrue and gave injustice to a person
> like Master Tara Singh who spent whole of his life for the
> welfare of the Sikh Panth. The readers must have assessed, by a
> reading of this chapter and having gone through the development
> of the events and the role of Master Tara Singh, that he was the
> most sincere leader who wanted creation of a Sikh State whereas
> the pro-Congress group always put obstacles on his path and
> collaborated with the anti-Sikh communal Hindu leadership of the
> Congress Party.[1] One can see that the Congress was constantly
> cheating the Sikhs; the British had never bothered for the
> safeguards or the future of the Sikhs; what to talk of offering
> a Sikh State, they did not, even once, offer even minor
> concessions to the
> Sikhs. The propaganda that in the last days of 1946, when
> the British had invited the leaders of all the three communities
> to London, and after the meeting was over, the former suggested
> Baldev Singh to stay back so that arrangement may be made for a
> Sikh State is a gossip concocted just to defame Baldev Singh;
> there was no such situation that the British were ever
> interested in offering the Sikhs anything; it is blatant lie and
> rape of history. The truth is that the five leaders Nehru,
> Patel, Jinnah, Liaqat Ali and Baldev Singh) had been invited to
> London to discuss the Cabinet Mission Plan but these talks
> failed and all of them returned empty-handed. There was no
> 'special request or suggestion' to Baldev Singh to stay back at
> that juncture; and, the English were not even ready to talk
> about a Sikh State and whenever the Sikhs put forth this demand
> they were told that they (Sikhs) did not have majority in any
> district except in two tehsils of Moga
> and Tarn Taran. Hence the story that Baldev Singh was
> asked to stay back and he shared this with Nehru who wooed him
> (Baldev) and made him to join him for going back without talking
> to the English Prime Minister. This concocted gossip story is
> injustice even to Baldev Singh who continued his efforts even
> when Mountbatten became the Viceroy in 1947 (and Master Tara
> Singh figures nowhere in this propaganda story too).
> Later, in 1986, Ram Singh, an unknown man, a
> personal enemy of Master Tara Singh, too wrote a 'book' to
> defame Master Tara Singh (and there is nothing in this book that
> establishes even a grain of the fact that Master Tara Singh did
> anything wrong); one can understand the intention of this Ram
> Singh, when he wrote a letter to the Director of the British
> Library on the 17th of June 1986, he said (his own words without
> correcting language, grammar etc):
> "Soon after the transfer of power to Pakistan and
> India the Akali leader Master Tara Singh in his several speeches
> created the misapprehension among the Sikhs that Lord
> Mountbatten was responsible for the destruction of Sikhs and
> thus deceived and betrayed the Sikhs. After careful and thorough
> studies of the records at your office I have been left in no
> doubt that this is not the case. It is evident from the records
> that Lord Mountbatten tried his best to help the Sikh cause. But
> it was the treacherous role of Akali leader Master Tara Singh
> who did not listen to the good and sincere advice of Lord
> Mountbatten. It is evidently clear that it was Akali leader who
> betrayed the Sikhs. In view of this I feel it my solemn duty to
> bring the true facts before the Sikhs that it was not Lord
> Mountbatten who was responsible for our present plight but it
> was our Akali leader Master Tara Singh who was and is
> responsible for our present plight.
> Secondly, I wish to restore the good name of Lord
> Mountbatten and British people among the Sikhs throughout the
> world, so that his name will command a great respect among the Sikhs."
> Besides Ram Singh, Jaswant Singh Kanwal, a middle
> standard novelist too committed rape of history in his book
> 'Punjabio Jeena Hai kay Marna'; this book is totally based on
> the book of Ram Singh; Kanwal is not a student of history and he
> has not read even complete history of the Sikhs, but, he has
> tried to become a historian and that even after reading just one
> book and that even just a hate-propaganda book by a personal
> enemy of Master Tara Singh.[2]
> Another point stressed by Kapur Singh that the Sikhs
> would have been better in Pakistan too is ridiculous and against
> the facts of the past and the present history. To say that had
> all the Hindus of Sind and Punjab would have become Sikhs and
> with their votes the Sikhs would have achieved absolute majority
> is a poor joke; even if all the Hindus would have embraced
> Sikhism, their number in Pakistan would not have been more than
> 10% and as the Muslims believe in producing several children
> simply to increase their population, the proportion of the Sikhs
> would still have been much less than even 10%. Secondly, one can
> observe the fate of the Ahmedia (Qadiani) community in Pakistan;
> they have been badly crushed and are second rate citizens; had
> the Sikhs cried foul and launched any struggle for their rights
> they would have got the same treatment.
> Kapur Singh seems to have been angry with Master
> Tara Singh for some reason and due to this personal resentment
> he did grave injustice to Master Tara Singh; it is crystal clear
> that it was Udham Singh Nagoke, Partap Singh Kairon, Darshan
> Singh Pheruman, Gopal Singh Qaumi, Amar Singh (of Sher-i-
> Punjab), Amar Singh Jhabal and his brothers, Sardool Singh
> Kaveehsar, Kharak Singh, Gurmukh Singh Musafir, Mangal Singh and
> their supporters who were either blind followers of Gandhi and
> Congress or were opponents of Master Tara Singh; and it was
> their opposition to the demand of a Sikh State which was the
> third[3] major factor of the Sikhs' failure to achieve Sikh
> State in 1947.
> Master Tara Singh spent whole of his life for the
> welfare of the Sikh nation; he did not even bother for his
> family which lived the life of poor people; his sons (Jaswant
> Singh and Mohan Singh) could not have any career nor property
> (they lived in a house at Amritsar that was just a poor small
> building even at the time of the death of Master Tara Singh in
> 1967). Had Master Tara Singh been a collaborator of the Hindus
> (as alleged by his mean opponents, Kapur Singh and an unknown
> writer Ram Singh), he would have had a big economic position and
> his sons would have had high position in political, economic
> and/or business spheres; further, Nehru and other anti-Sikh
> fanatic Hindu-Congressmen even opposed placing Master Tara
> Singh's picture in the Parliament House (Kharak Singh's picture
> was already there); Had Master Tara Singh been (secret) friend
> of the Hindu leaders (as it is propagated by Master's mean
> opponents) they would
> have constructed memorials in his name (at least after his
> death) which they rather opposed because Master Tara Singh was
> always disliked by the fanatic Hindus simply because he always
> fought for the rights of the Sikhs. Banda Singh Bahadur and
> Master Tara Singh are the two great Sikh leaders who have been
> victims of such heinous propaganda because both made great
> sacrifices and did never share benefits of power (Banda Singh
> Bahadur never treated himself as a ruler; and, Master Tara Singh
> never contested even for Punjab Assembly)' this is distortion of
> history and such rape of history is unknown even to history.
> Master Tara Singh might have been an emotional person; he might
> have, sometimes, behaved as a confused person (all of us might
> have done such at times); he might have been deceived by
> flattery sometimes; he might have committed mistakes; he might
> not have been a very intelligent or far-sighted person; he might
> be a weak person; whatever!, but,
> to label him as traitor is ungratefulness, and to quote
> Shakespeare (from the play King Lear):
> Blow blow thou winter wind.
> You are not so unkind.
> As man's ingratitude!
> Famous Sikh poet Bhai Gurdas also says the same:
> The greatest weight (burden) on this earth is the
> ungrateful people.
> They are the worst of the worst.
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] The unfounded allegations made by Sirdar Kapur Singh can
> well be defined as ungratefulness by a man whom Master Tara
> Singh brought out from isolation, nothingness and misery; and
> got him elected as M.P. and always promoted him; and stood for
> him in thick and thin.
>
>
> [2] This author told him not to spread such lies when Kanwal was
> addressing the students of Gurmat Gian Missionary College in
> 2007 but either Kanwal is too obstinate or he had been either
> poisoned or fooled or bribed by some person or group or agency.
>
>
> [3] Two other factors were callousness of the British and
> betrayal of the Sikhs by the Congress.
> --- On Sun, 29/5/11, Gurmit Singh <GurmitSingh01@bigpond.com>
> wrote:
>
> From: Gurmit Singh <GurmitSingh01@bigpond.com>
> Subject: RE: Comparing Sarna with Badal !!!!
> To: ANZ_SIKHS@yahoogroups.com, "SikhsSydney"
> <SikhsSydney@yahoogroups.com.au>Date: Sunday, 29 May, 2011, 14:15
>
>
>
> Respected Sikh Cyber Members,
>
> We may recall that during 1947, Master Tara Singh and Baldev
> Singh had betrayed
> the Sikh Nation politically by surrendering to the Indian
> Congress Leaders whereas
> Badal has proved to be the greatest deceitful, treacherous and
> ungrateful as he has
> sold the Sikh religion to BJP/RSS/Deravaad and other cults/sects.
> * Parkash Singh Badal (1927) was elected to the Punjab
> Legislative Assemby in
> 1957 as a Congress candidate;
> * then from 1970 he has been hobnobing with Jan Sangh/BJP/RSS;
> * he was the person, who allowed gathering of Nirankaris on 13
> April 1978 at
> Amritsar and instead of arresting the killers, he protected
> them and HukamNama
> was issued on 10 June 1978 merely to divert the attention of
> the Sikhs as otherwise
> action could have been taken against Badal and his government;
> * During 1984 his complicity can't be ruled out and since then
> he has been keeping
> his Sikh appearance whereas he has mortgaged his heart to
> the Congress/BJP/RSS/
> Deravaad/Radha-Soamis/other cults/sects for the sake of votes;
> * he has not helped any Sikh victim. Look at episode of Hoand
> in Haryana but his son
> has built luxurious Hotel in Gurgaon. Badal family already
> controls the Bus transport
> including golucks of the Historical Gurduaras and Takhts in
> Punjab. * Like the downfall of Khalsa Kingdom during 1839-1849,
> Badal is surrounded by the
> same Dogras and Poorbias but he has failed to read the
> writing on the wall.
> However, no Sikh Leader whether Political or Religious is "Dudh
> Dhota" ! But we, the
> Sikh Diaspora could do nothing except to wait and watch.
> Gurmit Singh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ANZ_SIKHS@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:ANZ_SIKHS@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of dmsingh65
> Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 4:52 PM
> To: ANZ_SIKHS@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [ANZ_SIKHS] Comparing Sarna with Badal !!!!
>
>
>
>
> Sarna seeks mercy for Bhullar, writes to Sonia Gandhi
> Prabhjot Singh
> Tribune News Service
>
> Chandigarh, May 28
> Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee chief Paramjit Singh
> Sarna has sought the intervention of UPA chairperson Sonia
> Gandhi for getting a reprieve for Devinder Pal Singh Bhullar.
>
> In a letter to Sonia Gandhi, Sarna said commuting Bhullar's
> death sentence in the September 1993 bombing of the Indian Youth
> Congress office case would be a "gesture of goodwill to the
> entire Sikh community. This can be one more act of forgiveness
> by which all the sides can forget and forgive the unfortunate
> chapter of militancy in Punjab".
>
> Notably, it was Sarna who on the eve of last General Election in
> the country had led a delegation of Delhi Sikhs to the UPA
> chairperson with four demands, including mercy to Bhullar.
>
> "The delay of more than eight years in disposal of mercy
> petition of Bhullar by both the NDA and the UPA government has
> in all probabilities rendered the death sentence
> unconstitutional. "Mercy to him even now will mean much more to
> millions of Sikhs than it is granted by the Supreme Court," said
> Sarna.
>
> Notably, the DSGMC wants that review should take place before
> the review petition of Bhullar comes up for legal adjudication
> by the Supreme Court.
>
>
>
From: DR AWATAR SINGH SEKHON <assekhon@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, May 29, 2011 at 9:26 PM
Subject: [bangla-vision] Re: Master Tara Singh "Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki) Responds"
Dr Harjinder Singh Dilgeer
Author of 10 Books on Sikh History
& author of numerous (hundred or thousand) of Articles
Dear Dr Harjinder Singh Dilgeer,
Waheguru ji ka Khalsa,
Waheguru ji ki Fateh!
This is in response to your message to Sirdar Gurmit Singh Khalsa, Justice of Peace, AUSTRALIA.
Regretfully, I have to say that Master Tara Singh, 24th June, 1884 - 22nd November, 1967, (a Brahmin by birth, raised in a Hindu family and became a Leader of Akali Party and parasite on the Guru Khalsa Panth, was one of the traitors of the Guru Khalsa Panth and as I view it), had least knowledge of the Sikh principles, the Sikh Rahat Maryada alias the Sikh Way of Life, and had special liking for the enemies of the Sikh Nation, Sikh Raj, the 'Landless Sikh Nation, PUNJAB (under the occupation of the 'Brahmins-Hindus' demoncracy/democracy/Zamhooriat).
My comments are 'NOT' directed at personal level at all. I am writing these words based on what is present in the public 'Domain'. Please see the Following:
"BETRAYAL OF SIKH NATION BY MASTER TARA SINGH With British Documents of Transfer of Power 1947, Written and Compiled by: Ram Singh, Second edition pp. 134, August 2009, ISBN 978-0-9811360-6-6 Published by The Sikh Educational Trust, University of Alberta Postal Outlet, Box 60246, EDMONTON, AB T6G 2S5 CANADA (includes ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS And A FEW WORDS OF THANKS by Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon of CANADA)"
After reading the First edition and views of my older and younger brothers I, on behalf of The Sikh Educational Trust, had to go for the publication of the above title. The Second edition is 'Not' available free to any person.
With regards.
Your brother,
Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki), Ph D, FIBA, RM (CCM)
Associate Professor (Retired), Medical Microbiology and Immunology
Director (Former), National Centre for Human Mycotic Diseases CANADA
Editor in Chief, International Journal of Sikh Affairs ISSN 1481-5435
*****
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Harjinder Singh Dilgeer" <hsdilgeer@yahoo.com>
Date: Sunday, May 29, 2011 4:13
Subject: Master Tara Singh
To: sikhcommunity@googlegroups.com
> Veer Gurmit Singh Ji,
> you have written that "
> We may recall that during 1947, Master Tara Singh and Baldev
> Singh had betrayed
> the Sikh Nation politically by surrendering to the Indian
> Congress Leaders"
> Dear it is totally unfair to blame Master Tara Singh (MTS) for
> 1947 crisis; please go through history and especially secret
> documents (now allowed to public). Blaming MTS for what he had
> not done is like being ungrateful for the man who sacrificed
> everything in his life.
>
> Please read the following (from my book 'SIKH HISTORY in 10
> volumes', volume 5:
>
>
> Role of Master Tara Singh
>
> Sirdar Kapur Singh, a disgruntled I.C.S. officer, in
> his book Saachi Saakhi has tried to put all the blame for not
> having achieved an independent Sikh State on Master Tara Singh
> and Baldev Singh but it is untrue and gave injustice to a person
> like Master Tara Singh who spent whole of his life for the
> welfare of the Sikh Panth. The readers must have assessed, by a
> reading of this chapter and having gone through the development
> of the events and the role of Master Tara Singh, that he was the
> most sincere leader who wanted creation of a Sikh State whereas
> the pro-Congress group always put obstacles on his path and
> collaborated with the anti-Sikh communal Hindu leadership of the
> Congress Party.[1] One can see that the Congress was constantly
> cheating the Sikhs; the British had never bothered for the
> safeguards or the future of the Sikhs; what to talk of offering
> a Sikh State, they did not, even once, offer even minor
> concessions to the
> Sikhs. The propaganda that in the last days of 1946, when
> the British had invited the leaders of all the three communities
> to London, and after the meeting was over, the former suggested
> Baldev Singh to stay back so that arrangement may be made for a
> Sikh State is a gossip concocted just to defame Baldev Singh;
> there was no such situation that the British were ever
> interested in offering the Sikhs anything; it is blatant lie and
> rape of history. The truth is that the five leaders Nehru,
> Patel, Jinnah, Liaqat Ali and Baldev Singh) had been invited to
> London to discuss the Cabinet Mission Plan but these talks
> failed and all of them returned empty-handed. There was no
> 'special request or suggestion' to Baldev Singh to stay back at
> that juncture; and, the English were not even ready to talk
> about a Sikh State and whenever the Sikhs put forth this demand
> they were told that they (Sikhs) did not have majority in any
> district except in two tehsils of Moga
> and Tarn Taran. Hence the story that Baldev Singh was
> asked to stay back and he shared this with Nehru who wooed him
> (Baldev) and made him to join him for going back without talking
> to the English Prime Minister. This concocted gossip story is
> injustice even to Baldev Singh who continued his efforts even
> when Mountbatten became the Viceroy in 1947 (and Master Tara
> Singh figures nowhere in this propaganda story too).
> Later, in 1986, Ram Singh, an unknown man, a
> personal enemy of Master Tara Singh, too wrote a 'book' to
> defame Master Tara Singh (and there is nothing in this book that
> establishes even a grain of the fact that Master Tara Singh did
> anything wrong); one can understand the intention of this Ram
> Singh, when he wrote a letter to the Director of the British
> Library on the 17th of June 1986, he said (his own words without
> correcting language, grammar etc):
> "Soon after the transfer of power to Pakistan and
> India the Akali leader Master Tara Singh in his several speeches
> created the misapprehension among the Sikhs that Lord
> Mountbatten was responsible for the destruction of Sikhs and
> thus deceived and betrayed the Sikhs. After careful and thorough
> studies of the records at your office I have been left in no
> doubt that this is not the case. It is evident from the records
> that Lord Mountbatten tried his best to help the Sikh cause. But
> it was the treacherous role of Akali leader Master Tara Singh
> who did not listen to the good and sincere advice of Lord
> Mountbatten. It is evidently clear that it was Akali leader who
> betrayed the Sikhs. In view of this I feel it my solemn duty to
> bring the true facts before the Sikhs that it was not Lord
> Mountbatten who was responsible for our present plight but it
> was our Akali leader Master Tara Singh who was and is
> responsible for our present plight.
> Secondly, I wish to restore the good name of Lord
> Mountbatten and British people among the Sikhs throughout the
> world, so that his name will command a great respect among the Sikhs."
> Besides Ram Singh, Jaswant Singh Kanwal, a middle
> standard novelist too committed rape of history in his book
> 'Punjabio Jeena Hai kay Marna'; this book is totally based on
> the book of Ram Singh; Kanwal is not a student of history and he
> has not read even complete history of the Sikhs, but, he has
> tried to become a historian and that even after reading just one
> book and that even just a hate-propaganda book by a personal
> enemy of Master Tara Singh.[2]
> Another point stressed by Kapur Singh that the Sikhs
> would have been better in Pakistan too is ridiculous and against
> the facts of the past and the present history. To say that had
> all the Hindus of Sind and Punjab would have become Sikhs and
> with their votes the Sikhs would have achieved absolute majority
> is a poor joke; even if all the Hindus would have embraced
> Sikhism, their number in Pakistan would not have been more than
> 10% and as the Muslims believe in producing several children
> simply to increase their population, the proportion of the Sikhs
> would still have been much less than even 10%. Secondly, one can
> observe the fate of the Ahmedia (Qadiani) community in Pakistan;
> they have been badly crushed and are second rate citizens; had
> the Sikhs cried foul and launched any struggle for their rights
> they would have got the same treatment.
> Kapur Singh seems to have been angry with Master
> Tara Singh for some reason and due to this personal resentment
> he did grave injustice to Master Tara Singh; it is crystal clear
> that it was Udham Singh Nagoke, Partap Singh Kairon, Darshan
> Singh Pheruman, Gopal Singh Qaumi, Amar Singh (of Sher-i-
> Punjab), Amar Singh Jhabal and his brothers, Sardool Singh
> Kaveehsar, Kharak Singh, Gurmukh Singh Musafir, Mangal Singh and
> their supporters who were either blind followers of Gandhi and
> Congress or were opponents of Master Tara Singh; and it was
> their opposition to the demand of a Sikh State which was the
> third[3] major factor of the Sikhs' failure to achieve Sikh
> State in 1947.
> Master Tara Singh spent whole of his life for the
> welfare of the Sikh nation; he did not even bother for his
> family which lived the life of poor people; his sons (Jaswant
> Singh and Mohan Singh) could not have any career nor property
> (they lived in a house at Amritsar that was just a poor small
> building even at the time of the death of Master Tara Singh in
> 1967). Had Master Tara Singh been a collaborator of the Hindus
> (as alleged by his mean opponents, Kapur Singh and an unknown
> writer Ram Singh), he would have had a big economic position and
> his sons would have had high position in political, economic
> and/or business spheres; further, Nehru and other anti-Sikh
> fanatic Hindu-Congressmen even opposed placing Master Tara
> Singh's picture in the Parliament House (Kharak Singh's picture
> was already there); Had Master Tara Singh been (secret) friend
> of the Hindu leaders (as it is propagated by Master's mean
> opponents) they would
> have constructed memorials in his name (at least after his
> death) which they rather opposed because Master Tara Singh was
> always disliked by the fanatic Hindus simply because he always
> fought for the rights of the Sikhs. Banda Singh Bahadur and
> Master Tara Singh are the two great Sikh leaders who have been
> victims of such heinous propaganda because both made great
> sacrifices and did never share benefits of power (Banda Singh
> Bahadur never treated himself as a ruler; and, Master Tara Singh
> never contested even for Punjab Assembly)' this is distortion of
> history and such rape of history is unknown even to history.
> Master Tara Singh might have been an emotional person; he might
> have, sometimes, behaved as a confused person (all of us might
> have done such at times); he might have been deceived by
> flattery sometimes; he might have committed mistakes; he might
> not have been a very intelligent or far-sighted person; he might
> be a weak person; whatever!, but,
> to label him as traitor is ungratefulness, and to quote
> Shakespeare (from the play King Lear):
> Blow blow thou winter wind.
> You are not so unkind.
> As man's ingratitude!
> Famous Sikh poet Bhai Gurdas also says the same:
> The greatest weight (burden) on this earth is the
> ungrateful people.
> They are the worst of the worst.
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] The unfounded allegations made by Sirdar Kapur Singh can
> well be defined as ungratefulness by a man whom Master Tara
> Singh brought out from isolation, nothingness and misery; and
> got him elected as M.P. and always promoted him; and stood for
> him in thick and thin.
>
>
> [2] This author told him not to spread such lies when Kanwal was
> addressing the students of Gurmat Gian Missionary College in
> 2007 but either Kanwal is too obstinate or he had been either
> poisoned or fooled or bribed by some person or group or agency.
>
>
> [3] Two other factors were callousness of the British and
> betrayal of the Sikhs by the Congress.
> --- On Sun, 29/5/11, Gurmit Singh <GurmitSingh01@bigpond.com>
> wrote:
>
> From: Gurmit Singh <GurmitSingh01@bigpond.com>
> Subject: RE: Comparing Sarna with Badal !!!!
> To: ANZ_SIKHS@yahoogroups.com, "SikhsSydney"
> <SikhsSydney@yahoogroups.com.au>Date: Sunday, 29 May, 2011, 14:15
>
>
>
> Respected Sikh Cyber Members,
>
> We may recall that during 1947, Master Tara Singh and Baldev
> Singh had betrayed
> the Sikh Nation politically by surrendering to the Indian
> Congress Leaders whereas
> Badal has proved to be the greatest deceitful, treacherous and
> ungrateful as he has
> sold the Sikh religion to BJP/RSS/Deravaad and other cults/sects.
> * Parkash Singh Badal (1927) was elected to the Punjab
> Legislative Assemby in
> 1957 as a Congress candidate;
> * then from 1970 he has been hobnobing with Jan Sangh/BJP/RSS;
> * he was the person, who allowed gathering of Nirankaris on 13
> April 1978 at
> Amritsar and instead of arresting the killers, he protected
> them and HukamNama
> was issued on 10 June 1978 merely to divert the attention of
> the Sikhs as otherwise
> action could have been taken against Badal and his government;
> * During 1984 his complicity can't be ruled out and since then
> he has been keeping
> his Sikh appearance whereas he has mortgaged his heart to
> the Congress/BJP/RSS/
> Deravaad/Radha-Soamis/other cults/sects for the sake of votes;
> * he has not helped any Sikh victim. Look at episode of Hoand
> in Haryana but his son
> has built luxurious Hotel in Gurgaon. Badal family already
> controls the Bus transport
> including golucks of the Historical Gurduaras and Takhts in
> Punjab. * Like the downfall of Khalsa Kingdom during 1839-1849,
> Badal is surrounded by the
> same Dogras and Poorbias but he has failed to read the
> writing on the wall.
> However, no Sikh Leader whether Political or Religious is "Dudh
> Dhota" ! But we, the
> Sikh Diaspora could do nothing except to wait and watch.
> Gurmit Singh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ANZ_SIKHS@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:ANZ_SIKHS@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of dmsingh65
> Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 4:52 PM
> To: ANZ_SIKHS@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [ANZ_SIKHS] Comparing Sarna with Badal !!!!
>
>
>
>
> Sarna seeks mercy for Bhullar, writes to Sonia Gandhi
> Prabhjot Singh
> Tribune News Service
>
> Chandigarh, May 28
> Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee chief Paramjit Singh
> Sarna has sought the intervention of UPA chairperson Sonia
> Gandhi for getting a reprieve for Devinder Pal Singh Bhullar.
>
> In a letter to Sonia Gandhi, Sarna said commuting Bhullar's
> death sentence in the September 1993 bombing of the Indian Youth
> Congress office case would be a "gesture of goodwill to the
> entire Sikh community. This can be one more act of forgiveness
> by which all the sides can forget and forgive the unfortunate
> chapter of militancy in Punjab".
>
> Notably, it was Sarna who on the eve of last General Election in
> the country had led a delegation of Delhi Sikhs to the UPA
> chairperson with four demands, including mercy to Bhullar.
>
> "The delay of more than eight years in disposal of mercy
> petition of Bhullar by both the NDA and the UPA government has
> in all probabilities rendered the death sentence
> unconstitutional. "Mercy to him even now will mean much more to
> millions of Sikhs than it is granted by the Supreme Court," said
> Sarna.
>
> Notably, the DSGMC wants that review should take place before
> the review petition of Bhullar comes up for legal adjudication
> by the Supreme Court.
>
>
>
--
Palash Biswas
Pl Read:
http://nandigramunited-banga.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment