Sunday, October 18, 2015

https://youtu.be/SOlq6RFwl3s Let Me Speak Human!Let Me support Kejriwal for his demand to control Delhi Police!Centre become Almighty? Why should he behave above the constitution,kill the Polity? Kejri is an elected chief minister of an Indian State having landslide Mandate. If the PM is empowered with the Mandate and Free to use his power,Why a CM is denied to execute the Mandate he got?Why the State and the people of Delhi should be deprived of full power and autonomy,the Constitution provides? Rapes continue,unprecedented violence continues as Woman is a SEX Slave in the patriarchal society in Manusmriti caste and class hegemony rule and we,the people have ceased to be Social Animal,rather we are political animals devoid of humanity, morality, ethics and armed with money and muscle power,making in!Free flow of foreign capital and foreign interests have reduced the woman to saleable commodity despite her empowerment,despite their executive roles in every sphere of life! Media,Art,L

Why should the Executive at the Centre become Almighty?

Why should he behave above the constitution,kill the Polity?

Let Me Speak Human!Let Me support Kejriwal for his demand to control Delhi Police!

Kejri is an elected chief minister of an Indian State having landslide Mandate.

If the PM is empowered with the Mandate and Free to use his power,Why a CM is denied to execute the Mandate he got?Why the State and the people of Delhi should be deprived of full power and autonomy,the Constitution provides?

Rapes continue,unprecedented violence continues as Woman is a SEX Slave in the patriarchal society in Manusmriti caste and class hegemony rule and we,the people have ceased to be Social Animal,rather we are political animals devoid of humanity, morality, ethics and armed with money and muscle power,making in!Free flow of foreign capital and foreign interests have reduced the woman to saleable commodity despite her empowerment,despite their executive roles in every sphere of life!

Media,Art,Literature,Culture and Society,mediums and genres should be apolitical,then why we have to care for the political equations?Why we should not speak human?Why everything ends with the Politics?Why all these virtues have to be subjected to subsidence in Marketing Strategies?

This nonsense must stop!

Police should not be accountable to State Govt,why then we boast federal democracy?What is the logic of making separate state controlled by centre which might not ensure the safety of woman?

NDTV shared:

Delhi Cop's Remarks on Rape 'Shameful, Insensitive': Arvind Kejriwal

ndtv.comSenior Delhi Police officer Deepak Mishra's reported comments on rape in the wake sexual assault of tw…

Palash Biswas

Indian Express reports:

RSS mouthpiece defends Dadri: Vedas order killing of sinners who kill cows

It alleges that madrasas and the Muslim leadership teach Indian Muslims to hate the country's traditions.

- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/rss-mouthpiece-defends-dadri-vedas-order-killing-of-sinners-who-kill-cows/#sthash.PJvEMgAC.dpuf

https://youtu.be/gruOksIyAzM

পুরানো সেই দিনের কথা: Memoirs of a Hindu Daughter of a Muslim Family which gave up BEEF!

আমরা এক বৃন্তে দুটি ফুল-হিন্দু মুসলমান!

Sabita Babu speaks from the Heart of the India,where Dilon kaa Bantwara naa huaa hai naa Hoga.Please share as much as you can to save India!The Real India,the greatest pilgrimage of humanity merging so many streams of humanity!

মন্ত্রহীন,ব্রাত্য,জাতিহারা রবীন্দ্রনাথ,রবীন্দ্র সঙ্গীতঃ দীনহীনে কেহ চাহে না, তুমি তারে রাখিবে জানি গো।

यह कैसी सियासती लड़ाई है मजहब की?बंटवारे की?

Mind you,the state Delhi is the national capital zone,where citizens including women have to enjoy previleges more than the masses in rest of India.Ironically nowhere else,the women,even those most empowered often raped and killed students from North East lynched,workers attacked and the Chief Minister feels helpless because the police is not accountable to the state government and the centre uses the police as it likes.

This nonsense must stop!

Capital Shame! 5-year-old and 2-year-old raped, what next, New Delhi monsters?

Even after the controversial legislation after Nirbhaya Rape and Murder that the Rapist should be hanged,nothing has changed hitherto!

Indian Woman is treated as Sex Slave irrespective of her caste,religion or race or status!Without rooting out the patriarchal society rapes would never stop and Indian society itself happens to be uprooted and gets the roots in the free market economy wherein Woman is reduced to the status of commodity on sale!

We are degenerated,decultured people devoid of ethics and morality,tradition whatsoever! Religion does not relate to faith or morality or ethics.It is reduced to politcs only.It is reduced to power politics equations acconting for violence unprecedented and holocaust unabated.

Thus ,women is quite unsafe at home,working place,public place anytime anywhere round the clock as relation mean nothing these days ie Mother and Son,Brother and Sister and Father and Daughter.

This decline of humanity and civilization is said to be development and empowerment!

Indian Express reports:

Repeated rape of minors is shameful, act or give control of Delhi Police: Arvind Kejriwal tells PM Modi

Repeated rape of minors is shameful and worrying, said Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal

New Delhi reels after rapes of girls aged two and five ...
▶
www.channelnewsasia.com/...delhi-reels.../2199294.ht...
11 hours ago
NEW DELHI: A toddler and a five-year-old girl were raped in separate attacks in ... was lured to a neighbour's ...
Either Modi should act or give control over police to Delhi ...
▶
www.ibnlive.com/videos/
With repeated cases of rapes of minors coming to light in the national capital, Delhi ... Arvind Kejriwal ...

I have nothing to do with APP,Kejriwal or its politics.But I support Kejri while he asks that the police should be accountable to the state government,Mind you,he heads that government as he is elected Chief Minister with a landslide mandate!

Let me quote from DR,Ambedkar`s maiden speech in the constitutional assembly which was debating the future of India while finalizing the framework of Constitution!The resolution was moved by the interim Prime Minister Jawahar Lal Nehru and the house was presided by Dr.Rajendra prasad.

Thus,Babsaheb spoke on the union of states and the centre!

I should like to invite your attention to Paragraph 3 of the Resolution, which I think (13/10) is very significant and very important. Paragraph 3 envisages the future constitution of India. I do not know what is the intention of the mover of the Resolution. But I take it that after this Resolution is passed, it will act as a sort of a directive to the Constituent Assembly to frame a constitution in terms of para. 3 of the Resolution. What does paragraph 3 say? Paragraph 3 says that in this country there shall be two different sets of polity, one at the bottom, autonomous Provinces or the States or such other areas as care to join a United India. These autonomous units will have full power. They will have also residuary powers. At the top, over the Provincial units, there will be a Union Government, having certain subjects for legislation, for execution and for administration. As I read this part of the Resolution, I do not find any reference to the idea of grouping, an intermediate structure between the Union on the one hand and the provinces on the other. Reading this para, in the light of the Cabinet Mission's Statement or reading it even in the light of the Resolution passed by the Congress at its Wardha session, I must confess that I am a great deal surprised at the absence of-anyreference to the idea of grouping of the provinces. So far as I am personally concerned, I do not like the idea of grouping (hear, hear) I like a strong united Centre, (hear, hear) much stronger than the Centre we had created under the Government of India Act of 1935. But, Sir, these opinions, these wishes have no bearing on the situation at all. We have travelled a long road. The Congress Party, for reasons best known to itself consented, if I may use that expression, to the dismantling of a strong Centre which had been created in this country as a result of 15U years of administration and which I must say, was to me a matter of great admiration and respect and refuge. But having given up that position, having said that we do not want a strong centre, and having accepted that there must be or should be an intermediate polity, a sub-federation between the Union Government and the Provinces I would like to know why there is no reference in para. 3 to the idea of grouping. I quite understand that the Congress Party, the Muslim League and His Majesty's Government are not ad idem on the interpretation of the clause relating to grouping. But I always thought that, — I am prepared to stand corrected if it is shown that I am wrong,—at least it was agreed by the Congress Party that if the Provinces which are placed within different groups consent to form a Union or Sub-federation, the Congress would have no objection to that proposal. Ibelieve I am correct in interpreting the mind of the (13/11) Congress Party. The question I ask is this. Why did not the Mover of this Resolution make reference to the idea of a Union of Province's or grouping of Provinces on the terms on which he and his party was prepared to accept it? Why is the idea of Union completely effaced from this Resolution? I find no answer. None whatever.

Babsaheb spoke earlier in the same speech:

I must confess that, coming as the Resolution does from Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru who is reputed to be a Socialist, this Resolution, although no controversial, is to my mind very disappointing. I should have expected him to go much further than he has done in that part of the Resolution. As a student of history, I should have preferred this part of the Resolution not being embodied in it at all. When one reads that part of the Resolution, it reminds one of the Declarations of the Rights of Man which was pronounced by the French Constituent Assembly. I think I am right in suggesting that, after the lapse of practically 450 years, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the principles which are embodied in it has become part and parcel of our mental makeup. I say they have become not only the part and parcel of the mental make-up of modern man in every civilised part of the world, but also in our own country which is so orthodox, so archaic in its thought and its social structure, hardly anyone can be found to deny its validity. To repeat it now as the Resolution does is, to say the least, pure pedantry. These principles have become the silent immaculate premise of our outlook. It is therefore unnecessary to proclaim as forming a part of our creed. The Resolution suffers from certain other lacuna. I find that this part of the Resolution, although it enunciates certain rights, does not speak of remedies. All of us are aware of the fact that rights are nothing unless remedies are provided whereby people can seek to obtain redress when rights are invaded. I find a complete absence of remedies. Even the usual formula that no man's life, liberty and property shall be taken without the due process of law, finds no place in the Resolution. These fundamental rights set out are made subject to law and morality. Obviously what is law, what is morality will be determined by the Executive of the day and when the Executive may take one view another Executive may take another view and we do not know what exactly(13/8) would be the position with regard to fundamental rights, if this matter is left to the Executive of the day. Sir, there are here certain provisions which speak of justice, economical, social and political. If this Resolution has a reality behind it and a sincerity, of which I have not the least doubt, coming as it does from the Mover of the Resolution, I should have expected some provision whereby it would have been possible for the State to make economic, social and political justice a reality and I should have from that point of view expected the Resolution to state in most explicit terms that in order that there may be social and economic justice in the country, that there would be nationalisation of industry and nationalisation of land, I do not understand how it could be possible for any future Government which believes in doing justice socially, economically and politically, unless its economy is a socialistic economy. Therefore, personally, although I have no objection to the enunciation of these propositions, the Resolution is, to my mind, somewhat disappointing. I am however prepared to leave this subject where it is with the observations I have made.

Written by Ashutosh Bhardwaj | New Delhi | Updated: October 18, 2015 4:27 am

RSS mouthpiece defends Dadri: Vedas order killing of sinners who kill cows

It alleges that madrasas and the Muslim leadership teach Indian Muslims to hate the country's traditions

The Panchjanya cover (left); Dadri victim Mohammed Akhlaq (right)

Slamming writers who have returned their awards in the wake of the incident in Dadri where a man was lynched over beef rumours, RSS mouthpiece Panchjanya, in its latest edition, has carried a cover story saying the Vedas order the killing of "sinners" who slaughter cows.

It alleges that madrasas and the Muslim leadership teach Indian Muslims to hate the country's traditions. "Akhlaq (the Dadri victim) perhaps slaughtered a cow under the influence of such bad deeds," it states. Questioning the silence of writers, it asks them why they have been quiet on this issue.

"Veda ka adesh hai ki gau hatya karne wale pataki ke pran le lo. Hum mein se bahuton ke liye to yah jivan-maran ka prashn hai (Vedas order killing of the sinner who kills a cow. It is a matter of life and death for many of us)," states the article 'Is Utpat ke Us paar' (The other side of this disturbance)' by Hindi writer Tufail Chaturvedi who edits the journal Lafz. Tufail is the name Vinay Krishna Chaturvedi uses.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Prev Next

"Cow slaughter is such a big thing for us that for hundreds of years our ancestors have staked their lives to prevent it and counter the killers.There are hundreds of such occasions in history when Muslim invaders thrust beef into our mouths to convert Hindus into Muslims," it reads.

Speaking to The Sunday Express, Chaturvedi cited several instances of Vedas prohibiting cow slaughter. "30.18 of Yajurveda says 'hand over capital punishment to those who kill cows'," he said, adding that "Gau-hatya Hinduon ke liye maan bindu hai (Cow slaughter is an issue of honour for Hindus). Muslims who commit such acts today are converted Hindus of Indian origin. It is important for social harmony that we respect faiths of each other."

In the article, Chaturvedi takes a swipe at writers who returned their awards after the lynching of Akhlaq: "Aapko Akhlaq dwara ki gayi gau-hatya nahi dikhayi di (You overlooked the cow-slaughter by Akhlaq). You did not consider that in the entire reporting of Akhlaq's death, there is no mention of Akhlaq's enmity with anyone in the village)".

Claiming that the killing was a "natural reaction" to the "sin" of cow slaughter, the cover story turns to Isaac Newton to state "Newton had propagated the theory of natural reaction to any action in 1687. Aap log yah nahi dekh paye ki aisi soch ke samaj men rahne wala Akhlaq itne bhayanak parinam dene wale paap ke liye utsuk kaise ho gaya (you could not consider that how did Akhlaq, living in a society with such feelings (for the cow) become eager to commit a sin that invites such dreadful consequences)."

It goes on to say that "if you do not respect the feelings of 80 per cent majority", then how can "such reactions be prevented".

The article claims that society does not consider those "who kill the sinner who have slaughtered a cow from the perspective of advocates of appeasement". The society "glorifies and remembers" such persons "martyred to prevent cow-slaughter", it states.

Describing Indian Muslims as Hindus who have been "converted", it states: "Who has taught the converted Indians to hate their origins, reject the traditions of centuries? After all, all Muslims, including Akhlaq, were Hindus until a few generations ago. Uske purvaj bhi usi tarah gau-rakshak thhe jaise gau-hatyaron ko dandit karne wale asankhya vir hain. (His ancestors were cow-protectors like the countless brave persons who punish those who kill cows). From where did these converted people gather so much hatred that they became cow-slaughterers from cow-protectors?"
Chaturvedi has named Muslim religious leaders who he claims have supported cow-slaughter and has questioned writers for never condemning "these wicked persons".

Underlining the significance of cows for Hindus, the cover story states that the 1857 revolt was triggered only after the order of uncapping cartridge greased with beef.

- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/rss-mouthpiece-defends-dadri-vedas-order-killing-of-sinners-who-kill-cows/#sthash.PJvEMgAC.dpuf